1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1990 Volvo 940
To start off, 1990 Volvo 940 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Volvo 940 (111 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Volvo 940 should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Volvo 940 weights approximately 294 kg more than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1990 Volvo 940 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Volvo 940. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Buick Skyhawk | 1990 Volvo 940 | |
| Make | Buick | Volvo |
| Model | Skyhawk | 940 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 111 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1374 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2780 mm |
