1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1996 Marcos Mantis

To start off, 1996 Marcos Mantis is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Marcos Mantis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Marcos Mantis (352 HP) has 251 more horse power than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Marcos Mantis should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Skyhawk.

Because 1996 Marcos Mantis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Marcos Mantis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Buick Skyhawk 1996 Marcos Mantis
Make Buick Marcos
Model Skyhawk Mantis
Year Released 1982 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1996 cc 4601 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 101 HP 352 HP
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Length 4560 mm 4170 mm
Vehicle Width 1660 mm 1880 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2290 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]