1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1998 Honda Capa
To start off, 1998 Honda Capa is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Buick Skyhawk (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1998 Honda Capa. (97 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1998 Honda Capa.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Buick Skyhawk | 1998 Honda Capa | |
| Make | Buick | Honda |
| Model | Skyhawk | Capa |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2370 mm |
