1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2002 Volvo S60
To start off, 2002 Volvo S60 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 2,319 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo S60 (129 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo S60 weights approximately 319 kg more than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Buick Skyhawk | 2002 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Buick | Volvo |
Model | Skyhawk | S60 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2319 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1399 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2760 mm |