1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2003 Volvo V50
To start off, 2003 Volvo V50 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo V50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo V50 (134 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo V50 should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo V50 weights approximately 358 kg more than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Buick Skyhawk | 2003 Volvo V50 | |
| Make | Buick | Volvo |
| Model | Skyhawk | V50 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2521 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 134 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1438 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2760 mm |
