1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2004 Mazda 3
To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Buick Skyhawk (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 3. (83 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 3 weights approximately 69 kg more than 1982 Buick Skyhawk.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Buick Skyhawk | 2004 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Buick | Mazda |
| Model | Skyhawk | 3 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1349 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1155 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2680 mm |
