1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2004 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2004 Suzuki Swift is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Buick Skyhawk (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2004 Suzuki Swift. (52 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 2004 Suzuki Swift. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 340 kg more than 2004 Suzuki Swift. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Buick Skyhawk | 2004 Suzuki Swift | |
| Make | Buick | Suzuki |
| Model | Skyhawk | Swift |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 52 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2270 mm |
