1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2004 Toyota MR2
To start off, 2004 Toyota MR2 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota MR2 (142 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota MR2 should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 21 kg more than 2004 Toyota MR2.
Because 2004 Toyota MR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Toyota MR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Buick Skyhawk | 2004 Toyota MR2 | |
| Make | Buick | Toyota |
| Model | Skyhawk | MR2 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1793 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 142 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1065 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2460 mm |
