1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2005 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2005 Volvo XC90 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo XC90 (311 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1108 kg more than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Buick Skyhawk | 2005 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Buick | Volvo |
| Model | Skyhawk | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 4399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 311 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 2188 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2720 mm |
