1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2006 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2006 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Cherokee (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 951 kg more than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Buick Skyhawk | 2006 Jeep Cherokee | |
| Make | Buick | Jeep |
| Model | Skyhawk | Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2776 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 2031 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2650 mm |
