1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP) has 418 more horse power than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Skyhawk.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Buick Skyhawk | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Make | Buick | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Skyhawk | CLS |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 507 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |