1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2006 Mercury Milan
To start off, 2006 Mercury Milan is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 2,278 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mercury Milan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercury Milan (160 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercury Milan should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercury Milan weights approximately 936 kg more than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Mercury Milan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mercury Milan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Buick Skyhawk | 2006 Mercury Milan | |
Make | Buick | Mercury |
Model | Skyhawk | Milan |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2278 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 2016 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2730 mm |