1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2009 Audi R8
To start off, 2009 Audi R8 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 5,204 cc (10 cylinders), 2009 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi R8 (518 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 417 more horse power than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Audi R8 weights approximately 500 kg more than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Buick Skyhawk | 2009 Audi R8 | |
| Make | Buick | Audi |
| Model | Skyhawk | R8 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 5204 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 518 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 8000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2660 mm |
