1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 59 more horse power than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Skyhawk.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Buick Skyhawk | 2009 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Buick | Holden |
| Model | Skyhawk | Epica |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2700 mm |
