1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 3,725 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 243 kg more than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Buick Skyhawk | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | Skyhawk | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3725 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1329 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2880 mm |