1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2010 Ford Bantam
To start off, 2010 Ford Bantam is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Buick Skyhawk (101 HP) has 27 more horse power than 2010 Ford Bantam. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Bantam. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 114 kg more than 2010 Ford Bantam. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Buick Skyhawk | 2010 Ford Bantam | |
| Make | Buick | Ford |
| Model | Skyhawk | Bantam |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1296 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 74 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2670 mm |
