1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 259 more horse power than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Skyhawk.
Because 2010 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Buick Skyhawk | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Buick | Holden |
| Model | Skyhawk | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 360 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
