1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2011 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 4,367 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover (311 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Skyhawk.
Because 2011 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Buick Skyhawk | 2011 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Buick | Land Rover |
| Model | Skyhawk | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4367 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 311 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4973 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2035 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2891 mm |
