1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2013 Audi A5
To start off, 2013 Audi A5 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Audi A5 (208 HP) has 119 more horse power than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Audi A5 should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Audi A5 weights approximately 543 kg more than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Audi A5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Audi A5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Buick Skyhawk | 2013 Audi A5 | |
| Make | Buick | Audi |
| Model | Skyhawk | A5 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | rear |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 208 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1629 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4626 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2020 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2751 mm |
