1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (464 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 363 more horse power than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 790 kg more than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jaguar XJ is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Buick Skyhawk | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Buick | Jaguar |
| Model | Skyhawk | XJ |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | W |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 464 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1870 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2105 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3157 mm |
