1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C (245 HP) has 156 more horse power than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 609 kg more than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Mercedes-Benz C is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz C will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Buick Skyhawk | 2013 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Buick | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Skyhawk | C |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 245 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1695 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4591 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2008 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2760 mm |