1982 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1982 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,031 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 780 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac Brougham | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
Model | Brougham | 2000 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5031 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2700 mm |