1982 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1969 MG 1100
To start off, 1982 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 MG 1100 would be higher. At 5,031 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1110 kg more than 1969 MG 1100.
Because 1982 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Cadillac Brougham | 1969 MG 1100 | |
| Make | Cadillac | MG |
| Model | Brougham | 1100 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5031 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2380 mm |
