1982 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1970 Mazda 1000
To start off, 1982 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mazda 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mazda 1000 would be higher. At 5,031 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1140 kg more than 1970 Mazda 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Cadillac Brougham | 1970 Mazda 1000 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | Brougham | 1000 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5031 cc | 1272 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 66 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 3800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2270 mm |
