1982 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1982 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 7,462 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 150 kg more than 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Cadillac Brougham | 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Brougham | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5031 cc | 7462 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 248 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2850 mm |
