1982 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1973 Triumph Stag
To start off, 1982 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Triumph Stag. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Triumph Stag would be higher. At 5,031 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 750 kg more than 1973 Triumph Stag.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac Brougham | 1973 Triumph Stag | |
Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
Model | Brougham | Stag |
Year Released | 1982 | 1973 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5031 cc | 2997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 124 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2550 mm |