1982 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1989 Nissan Pintara
To start off, 1989 Nissan Pintara is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,031 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 790 kg more than 1989 Nissan Pintara.
Because 1982 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Nissan Pintara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Cadillac Brougham | 1989 Nissan Pintara | |
| Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
| Model | Brougham | Pintara |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1989 |
| Engine Size | 5031 cc | 1974 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 111 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2560 mm |
