1982 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1990 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1990 Ford Ranger is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,031 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1990 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac Brougham | 1990 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Brougham | Ranger |
Year Released | 1982 | 1990 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5031 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4690 mm |