1982 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1994 Mazda 626
To start off, 1994 Mazda 626 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,031 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 738 kg more than 1994 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac Brougham | 1994 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Brougham | 626 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1994 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5031 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1212 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2620 mm |