1982 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2001 Daewoo Korando
To start off, 2001 Daewoo Korando is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,031 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 862 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Korando.
Because 1982 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Korando, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac Brougham | 2001 Daewoo Korando | |
Make | Cadillac | Daewoo |
Model | Brougham | Korando |
Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5031 cc | 3199 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 105 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1088 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2530 mm |