1982 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2001 Skoda Fabia
To start off, 2001 Skoda Fabia is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,031 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Skoda Fabia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac Brougham | 2001 Skoda Fabia | |
Make | Cadillac | Skoda |
Model | Brougham | Fabia |
Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5031 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2470 mm |