1982 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2002 Pontiac Grand Am
To start off, 2002 Pontiac Grand Am is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,031 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 751 kg more than 2002 Pontiac Grand Am.
Because 1982 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Pontiac Grand Am, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac Brougham | 2002 Pontiac Grand Am | |
Make | Cadillac | Pontiac |
Model | Brougham | Grand Am |
Year Released | 1982 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5031 cc | 3399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1199 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2730 mm |