1982 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz R
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,031 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz R weights approximately 255 kg more than 1982 Cadillac Brougham.
Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz R is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Cadillac Brougham | 2005 Mercedes-Benz R | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Brougham | R |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5031 cc | 3498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 268 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 2205 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3220 mm |
