1982 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,031 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 3 kg more than 1982 Cadillac Brougham.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac Brougham | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | Brougham | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5031 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1953 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2830 mm |