1982 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2011 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2011 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,031 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 7 kg more than 1982 Cadillac Brougham.
Because 2011 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac Brougham | 2011 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | Brougham | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5031 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 202 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1957 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2946 mm |