1982 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1958 DKW Munga
To start off, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1958 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1958 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 42 kg more than 1958 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac Cimarron | 1958 DKW Munga | |
Make | Cadillac | DKW |
Model | Cimarron | Munga |
Year Released | 1982 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2010 mm |