1982 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1961 Volvo 220
To start off, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1961 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1961 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 137 kg more than 1961 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Cadillac Cimarron | 1961 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | Cimarron | 220 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2610 mm |
