1982 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1963 Fiat Grand Break
To start off, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1963 Fiat Grand Break. (96 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1963 Fiat Grand Break. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Fiat Grand Break weights approximately 118 kg more than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 1963 Fiat Grand Break is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Fiat Grand Break. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Cadillac Cimarron | 1963 Fiat Grand Break | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | Cimarron | Grand Break |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1793 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 1270 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2660 mm |
