1982 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1965 Moretti 2500
To start off, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Moretti 2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Moretti 2500 would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Moretti 2500 (143 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Moretti 2500 should accelerate faster than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Moretti 2500 weights approximately 168 kg more than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Moretti 2500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Moretti 2500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac Cimarron | 1965 Moretti 2500 | |
Make | Cadillac | Moretti |
Model | Cimarron | 2500 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2454 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2660 mm |