1982 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1965 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 252 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Cadillac Cimarron | 1965 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
| Model | Cimarron | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1189 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2290 mm |
