1982 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1968 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 212 more horse power than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 1968 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Cadillac Cimarron | 1968 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Cimarron | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 7010 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 335 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2750 mm |
