1982 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1969 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1969 Suzuki Fronte. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1969 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 392 kg more than 1969 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Cadillac Cimarron | 1969 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
| Model | Cimarron | Fronte |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 785 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2160 mm |
