1982 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1974 Zastava 2101
To start off, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1974 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1974 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 192 kg more than 1974 Zastava 2101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1974 Zastava 2101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Zastava 2101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Cadillac Cimarron | 1974 Zastava 2101 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
| Model | Cimarron | 2101 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1974 |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2430 mm |
