1982 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1978 Mazda 626
To start off, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 626. (79 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mazda 626 weights approximately 18 kg more than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 1978 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac Cimarron | 1978 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Cimarron | 626 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2520 mm |