1982 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1981 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1981 Seat Ritmo. (63 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1981 Seat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 270 kg more than 1981 Seat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Cadillac Cimarron | 1981 Seat Ritmo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Seat |
| Model | Cimarron | Ritmo |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 882 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2460 mm |
