1982 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1983 Datsun 280
To start off, 1983 Datsun 280 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Datsun 280 (180 HP) has 57 more horse power than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Datsun 280 should accelerate faster than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Datsun 280 weights approximately 278 kg more than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Datsun 280 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Datsun 280. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac Cimarron | 1983 Datsun 280 | |
Make | Cadillac | Datsun |
Model | Cimarron | 280 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1983 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 180 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2330 mm |