1982 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (145 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Cadillac Cimarron | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Cimarron | Ranger |
Year Released | 1982 | 1983 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2844 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4690 mm |