1982 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1984 Daewoo Maepsy-Na

To start off, 1984 Daewoo Maepsy-Na is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1984 Daewoo Maepsy-Na. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1984 Daewoo Maepsy-Na. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 232 kg more than 1984 Daewoo Maepsy-Na. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1984 Daewoo Maepsy-Na is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Daewoo Maepsy-Na. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Cadillac Cimarron 1984 Daewoo Maepsy-Na
Make Cadillac Daewoo
Model Cimarron Maepsy-Na
Year Released 1982 1984
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2844 cc 1492 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 123 HP 59 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 5000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1152 kg 920 kg
Vehicle Length 4530 mm 4270 mm
Vehicle Width 1660 mm 1620 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2410 mm