1982 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1995 Honda Argento Viva

To start off, 1995 Honda Argento Viva is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Honda Argento Viva (188 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Honda Argento Viva should accelerate faster than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Honda Argento Viva weights approximately 88 kg more than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1995 Honda Argento Viva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Honda Argento Viva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Cadillac Cimarron 1995 Honda Argento Viva
Make Cadillac Honda
Model Cimarron Argento Viva
Year Released 1982 1995
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2844 cc 2451 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 123 HP 188 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 6500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1152 kg 1240 kg
Vehicle Length 4530 mm 4250 mm
Vehicle Width 1660 mm 1800 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2560 mm