1982 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1998 Honda SSM
To start off, 1998 Honda SSM is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Honda SSM is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Honda SSM. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Cadillac Cimarron | 1998 Honda SSM | |
| Make | Cadillac | Honda |
| Model | Cimarron | SSM |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 1999 cc |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2580 mm |
